I’ve spent a lot of time recently reading up on assessment, and thought I would share a little of what I’ve found.
Since being introduced to the idea of AfL during my PGCE, I’ve struggled trying to find a way to make sure that assessment is really embedded in my teaching, but without a good understanding of what assessment actually is and why I should bother this has been a difficult process.
Decent teachers check that students are learning. Even better teachers change what they are doing to make sure students are learning ‘better’. We call this teaching; as I heard Andrew Davies say at the recent Leeds Trinity University Postgraduate Conference for Education (and launch of the West Yorkshire branch of the Philosophy of Education Society of Great Britain) “Teachers are not teaching unless they are interacting with their pupils.” Really, if you’re not changing what you’re doing to match the needs and progress of learners then it’s not really teaching, it’s just talking at people.
Arguably assessment is more important than ever, especially given that the removal of national curriculum levels has rightly or wrongly taken away one tool for discussing progress. This has been noted by the NFER in “Where have all the levels gone?“.
So, in order to try and contribute to this discourse about assessment I want to give my spin on the questions “what is assessment?”, “why do we bother?”, and “how can we do it?”.
What is assessment?
I think the definition of assessment in a school context is tied up with its purpose, since
The purpose of any assessment is to measure the level of some defined trait, quality or ability within the subject being tested. This may be a body of knowledge, competence in a skill, or estimation of future potential.
(Tisi et al 2013)
So, simply, I’d say that assessment is any tool used to measure these things.
Why do we bother assessing?
The ASE’s policy document on assessment gives three major purposes of assessment:
- To support and improve teaching and learning directly
- To improve the performance of teachers and institutions
- To promote lifelong learning through qualifications and to provide information to the wider community
If we take these points in turn we can really see why assessment is a foundation of everything that happens in school, and goes far beyond exam questions or tests.
Here I’d like to focus on the top one; teaching and learning. The second point is more suited to a wider institutional look at assessment, and links into the performance management and appraisal process. Far more knowledgeable folk than me have written at length about how to make this effective!
The final point is more related to society as a whole which, although interesting and very important, is too much to write about now.
How assessment works and matters
Quality of teaching
We need absolutely need to avoid the ‘twin sins’ of traditional curriculum design (Wiggins & McTighe), which are…
- activity-oriented planning, ‘hands-on without being minds-on’
- planning for ‘coverage’, concentrating on teaching the content
Whitehouse (2014) says that “while these approaches might lead to classrooms that look productive, in the first case physical activity and talk, and in the second case teacher exposition and student notetaking, the result is the same: students who cannot see the intellectual purpose of the lesson”
The alternative is to…
- focus on teaching and assessing for understanding and learning transfer
- designing a curriculum ‘backward’ from those ends
This is ‘backward design’; assessment considered first, lessons designed around them. In this sense assessment is put at the core of all teaching. It flips the “starter/main/plenary” model on its head, and instead treats lesson planning as answering a series of questions;
- What am I actually teaching? This should be accurately related to specifications or new NC
references, and appropriate to the class.
- What do I want learners to have done by the end of this lesson? This is where we can
produce assessable outcomes, and consider developing activities around these objectives.
- How am I going to support them to do it? This includes any initial exposition, and
differentiated scaffolding through the lesson.
- How am I going to get them interested in the first place? What’s the ‘hook’?
Since any change must be evaluated (otherwise it’s a bit pointless; how will you know if it was a waste of time or not?), then quality of teaching in this sense could be evaluated through lesson observation, learner feedback, or reading developed schemes of work, amongst other ways.
Quality of Learning
Alongside making sure that the teaching is excellent, assessment can be used to improve learning. This is seen in the findings of Karpike & Roediger (2008), which show that regular testing of content massively aids retention – far, far more than “revision” (which is shown to be largely ineffective without assessment). The implications of this are simple; every test should be as synoptic as possible to allow students to retain as much knowledge as possible.
The recommendation here is that there is a regular ‘testing’ regimen, and that it contains synoptic elements of all material studied. Ever. Or at least in your subject area.
The evaluation of this strategy might again come from pupil surveys, but also from test data.
It’s the time of year when teachers are frequently required to redesign year plans and schemes of work. Maybe just think about trying some ‘backwards design’ when it comes to assessments, and make sure any formal testing has a nice summative chunk.